2. |
James J in Fagan v Commissioner of Metropolitan Police [1969] 1 Q.B. 439 said 「For an assault to be committed both the elements of actus reus and mens rea must be present at the same time. The “actus reus” is the action causing the effect on the victim's mind (see the observations of Park B. in Regina v. St. George (1840) 9 C & P 483, 490, 493 . The “mens rea” is the intention to cause that effect. It is not necessary that mens rea should be present at the inception of the actus reus; it can be superimposed upon an existing act.」 |